ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 3Decisions 3Judges 2Parties 2Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

security for costs: eu domicile as factor reducing enforcement risk

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

security for costs: eu domicile as factor reducing enforcement risk

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Firm scorecards

Activity, side mix, division specialization, top clients.

Legal principlesecurity for costs: eu domicile as factor reducing enforcement risk Clear all

Top firms in scope

Click a firm name for their profile. Counts are case-level — a firm appearing on both sides of one case counts once per side.

Firm	Cases	Claimant-side	Respondent-side	Attorneys	Top divisions
Müller Schupfner & Partner mbB	1	1	0	1	Paris CD (1)
Eisenführ Speiser PartGmbB	1	0	1	1	Paris CD (1)