View All Judges
View all cases
Uwe Schwengelbeck
Court of Appeal · Milan CD · Milan LD · Munich LD · Paris CD · Vienna LD
Total cases
42 (15 active)
PI grant rate
00%
Infringement rate
00%
Median days-to-decision
000
Track record
How this judge's rates compare against the Court of Appeal division and the full UPC average.
| Metric | This judge | Court of Appeal | All UPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | 42 | 614 | 2,830 |
| Preliminary injunction grant rate | 00% | 00% | 00% |
| Infringement rate | 00% | 00% | 00% |
| Revocation rate | 00% | 00% | 00% |
| Median days-to-decision | 000 | 000 | 000 |
Outcome rates require an account
Sign in to see this judge's PI grant rate, infringement rate, revocation rate and time-to-decision — benchmarked against the division and the full UPC.
Sign in or create an accountRecent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- 2026-02-10UPC CoA 20/2026Court of Appeal—M-A-S Maschinen- und Anlagenbau Schulz GmbH v Altech Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
- 2025-10-14UPC CFI 1167/2025Milan CDProcedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
- 2025-08-21UPC CFI 773/2025Milan CD—Insulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
- 2025-08-21UPC CFI 774/2025Milan CDCosts onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
- 2025-07-02UPC CFI 603/2025Court of Appeal—Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin International, Inc.,
- 2025-06-23UPC APP 29763/2025Vienna LD—Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH
- 2025-05-28UPC CFI 477/2025Milan CDProcedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
- 2025-05-22UPC APP 24558/2025Paris CD—Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. v Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Christopher MAIERHÖFER
- 2025-05-16UPC APP 23569/2025Munich LDProcedural onlyShenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH
- 2025-05-14UPC CFI 425/2025Paris CD—Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Christopher MAIERHÖFER v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH