UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties1Firms

Parties

Filing frequency, side mix, win records, firms typically retained — by corporate group or standalone party.

Legal principlesummary validity assessment at pi stage limited to best three invalidity argumentsClear all

SharkNinja Germany GmbH

Operating company
Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
11
Claimant-side
4
Respondent-side
7
Win rate
0%
Top opponents
  • Dyson Technology Limited3
Top firms
  • DLA Piper6
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer6
Recent cases
  • 2025-09-08UPC_CFI_840/2025—SEB S.A v SharkNinja Operating LLC
  • 2024-10-15UPC_CFI_588/2024—SharkNinja Germany GmbH v Dyson Technology Limited
  • 2024-05-30UPC_CoA_297/2024PI deniedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_52471/2024Procedural onlySharkNinja Europe Limited v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —UPC_APP_283/2025DismissedSharkNinja Europe Limited v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —ACT_589207/2023PI grantedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_5727/2025SettledDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_55674/2024Procedural onlyDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_159/2025Procedural onlyDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —APL_32012/2024PI deniedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited