UPClytics
Overview · Filed:

UPC_APP_44953/2024

Procedural & sub-applicationsOther ProceduralMunich LDGeneric application
Parties

Claimants

  • SES-imagotag SA
Reps: Alexandre Hoffmann ((not specified))

Respondents

  • Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd
  • Hanshow Germany GmbH
  • Hanshow France SAS
  • Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Reps: Roland Küppers ((not specified))
Judges
  • (panel 2, Munich Ld)Panel
Patents
Outcome
Costs only
Filed:
First decided: Oct 18, 2024
Language:

Decision of Munich Local Division in SES-imagotag SA v Hanshow Technology / Hanshow Germany / Hanshow France / Hanshow Netherlands on Hanshow's application for costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal (APL_8/2024, UPC_CoA_1/2024). The court dismissed the costs application as inadmissible because it was not filed within the time limit. The court also rejected Hanshow's application for reinstatement (Wiedereinsetzung) as it had not been filed at the competent court (first instance) and the reinstatement fee had not been paid.