UPC_CoA_454/2024

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed

Overview Decisions Citations Documents Timeline

Parties

Claimants

Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy

Reps: Mikko Kalervo Väänänen

Respondents

Microsoft Corporation

Reps: Prof. Tilmann Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)

Judges

Patricia Rombach

Patents

EP 2 671 173

CPC codes: G06F16/951, G06F16/24578, G06Q30/0619, G06F16/9537, H04W4/02, G06F16/24575, H04W4/029

Sector: Computing & AI

Outcome

Dismissed

Filed: Aug 1, 2024

First decided: —

Language: English

Court of Appeal held that Microsoft's appeal against an order denying its R.361 RoP request (manifestly inadmissible application) was inadmissible because the impugned order was a case management order issued by a single judge-rapporteur rather than a panel. An appeal from a case management order is only admissible if the order was issued by a panel. The request for discretionary review was dismissed.

Open on UPC Registry