UPClytics
English
Sign inSign up
Analytics2,692Cases1,785Decisions257Judges1,851Parties459Firms

Cases

Workhorse listing across all UPC cases. Filters apply across tabs.

CasesDecisionsJudgesPartiesFirmsAnalytics
DateCaseDivisionActionMotionOutcomeSummary
2026-01-26UPC_CoA_917/2025Court of AppealApplication RoP262-2ProceduralProcedural onlyThe Court of Appeal issued an order on Merz Pharmaceuticals' request under R. 262.2 RoP to keep certain information (including Exhibit 823) confidential in the Merz v. Viatris Santé proceedings. The Court reiterated that R. 262.2 RoP requests are addressed to future public access requests, not to the other party. Protection against the other party's use of confidential information requires a R. 262A RoP confidentiality order. The Court declined to issue a decision on the R. 262.2 request at this stage pending any public access application.
2025-11-07UPC_CoA_579/2025Court of AppealApplication for provisional measuresPreliminary injunctionPI deniedCourt of Appeal allowed OTEC's appeal and set aside the first-instance order granting provisional measures to STEROS. The CoA found the appeal successful and ordered that STEROS's application for provisional measures be rejected. STEROS was ordered to bear the costs of both the first-instance and appeal proceedings.
2025-11-07UPC_CoA_579/2025Court of AppealApplication for provisional measuresProceduralProcedural onlyThe Court of Appeal (Panel 1a: Grabinski, Gougé, Blok, Meewisse, Schmidt) partially granted STEROS GPA Innovative S.L.'s application for rectification (R. 353 RoP) of the Court of Appeal's order of 7 November 2025 which had set aside the Hamburg Local Division's provisional measures grant and rejected the application for provisional measures concerning EP 4 249 647. The court corrected a clerical mistake in margin 45 (Table 1 changed to Table 10), but rejected STEROS' further argument that margin 43 contained an 'obvious slip' since the proposed change would affect the substance of the reasoning.
2025-05-23ACT_17434/2024Paris LDInfringement ActionInfringement meritsRevokedParis Local Division revoked the Dutch, French, German and Italian parts of claims 1-6 of EP 3 155 936 (Hurom slow juicer) as unconditionally amended in the Main Request, and claims 1-3 as amended in the Auxiliary Request, following NUC Electronics' counterclaim for revocation. The patent was found invalid under Art. 138(1) EPC. All of Hurom's infringement claims were dismissed. Hurom's claims for infringement in Poland were held admissible (BSH v Electrolux principle) but dismissed on the merits for lack of evidence. Hurom was ordered to bear all costs.
2025-02-21ACT_61342/2024Hamburg LDApplication for provisional measuresPreliminary injunctionPI deniedThe Hamburg Local Division dismissed Teleflex Life Sciences II LLC's application for provisional measures against Speed Care Mineral GmbH regarding hemostatic wound-care products, because Teleflex failed to demonstrate with sufficient certainty that the attacked embodiment contained a 'binder' as required by the patent claims, and the burden of proof was not reversed.