UPClytics

Cases

Workhorse listing across all UPC cases. Filters apply across tabs.

DateCaseDivisionActionMotionOutcomeSummary
2026-02-24UPC_CFI_337/2025Munich CDRevocation ActionRevocation meritsPatent maintainedThe Central Division (Munich) dismissed TCL Europe's revocation action against Corning's EP 3 296 274 (glass composition), finding all invalidity attacks unsuccessful. The patent was maintained as granted; TCL was ordered to bear Corning's legal costs.
2026-02-24UPC_CFI_829/2024Munich CDRevocation ActionRevocation meritsRevokedThe Central Division (Munich) revoked EP 2 611 800 (sugar compositions) in its entirety for Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands and Sweden, finding the claims lacked inventive step and the application to amend was dismissed. The defendant bears UPM's costs.
2025-12-01UPC_CFI_337/2025Munich CDRevocation ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Central Division (Section Munich) judge-rapporteur issued a Rule 105.5 interim conference order in the revocation action concerning EP 3 296 274, setting procedural timetable, case valuation, and directions for further submissions including responses to an expert opinion.
2025-11-21UPC_CFI_829/2024Munich CDRevocation ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Central Division (Munich) issued an order following the interim conference under Rule 105.5 RoP in UPM-Kymmene's revocation action against International N&H Denmark ApS, setting the case value at EUR 1,000,000 and confirming the oral hearing date of 15 January 2026.
2025-10-10UPC_CFI_280/2025Munich CDRevocation ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Central Division Munich (judge-rapporteur Kupecz) issued an order following the interim conference in the Wirplast v Vilpe revocation action concerning EP 2 649 380, permitting the defendant to re-order its auxiliary requests and setting procedural deadlines.
2025-04-18UPC_CFI_526/2024Munich CDGeneric OrderProcedural onlyCase management order in a revocation action. The court noted the written pleadings have been exchanged and set the further procedural steps. The claimant seeks full revocation of EP 3 767 151; the defendant seeks dismissal and, in the alternative, maintenance of the patent in amended form across 80 auxiliary requests.