UPClytics

Cases

Workhorse listing across all UPC cases. Filters apply across tabs.

DateCaseDivisionActionMotionOutcomeSummary
2023-09-29UPC_CFI_15/2023Munich LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Munich Local Division issued a procedural order setting out requirements for using official CMS forms and workflows, and clarifying that a security for costs application under Rule 158.1 RoP requires demonstration that the opposing party's financial circumstances give reason to fear a cost order cannot be enforced.
2023-08-28UPC_CFI_249/2023Munich LDApplication for provisional measuresProceduralProcedural onlyThe Munich Local Division scheduled an oral hearing for 10 October 2023 in provisional measures proceedings by Edwards Lifesciences against Meril GmbH (EP 3 763 331), setting timelines for responses to objections and arranging simultaneous interpretation.
2023-08-23UPC_CFI_15/2023Munich LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Munich Local Division addressed Meril GmbH's request to align deadline for filing the preliminary objection with the deadline running for co-defendant Meril Life Sciences, granting a moderate extension while noting that alignment can also be achieved by shortening later deadlines.
2023-08-14UPC_CFI_249/2023Munich LDApplication for provisional measuresProceduralProcedural onlyThe Munich Local Division held that successful service on one co-defendant could constitute effective alternative service on another co-defendant under Rule 275.2 RoP in Edwards Lifesciences' infringement action, given CMS malfunction.
2023-08-10UPC_CFI_15/2023Munich LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Munich Local Division granted Meril GmbH's deadline extension request for filing a preliminary objection, allowing harmonisation of deadlines across co-defendants given service issues and CMS access problems encountered in the early days of the UPC.
2023-08-03UPC_CFI_239/2023The Hague LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Hague Local Division granted Plant-e's request under R. 13(q) / R. 7.1 RoP that English-language exhibits need not be translated into Dutch, as the defendant had no apparent interest in requiring Dutch translations.
Page 3 of 3 · 106