Cases
Workhorse listing across all UPC cases. Filters apply across tabs.
| Date | Case | Division | Action | Motion | Outcome | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-23 | UPC_CFI_1325/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 | Evidence | Procedural only | The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a further order in the Van Loon v. Inverquark evidence preservation proceedings, addressing the release of the expert's detailed description and a request for a supplementary expert opinion following the Aquanale Köln inspection. |
| 2025-10-30 | UPC_CFI_1325/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 | Evidence | Procedural only | The Düsseldorf Local Division granted an ex parte order for inspection and preservation of evidence at the Aquanale trade fair in Cologne regarding the defendants' 'InverJet' counter-current swimming device, in anticipation of a main infringement action. |
| 2025-09-18 | ORD_29532/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Generic Order | Procedural | Procedural only | Düsseldorf Local Division (18 September 2025) stayed the proceedings against TP-Link Corporation PTE. LTD. (defendant 1) by consent of the parties pending the outcome of EPO opposition appeal proceedings (R. 295(a) RoP), extending a prior stay already in place against defendants 2–4. |
| 2025-07-24 | UPC_APP_32860/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Application Rop 265 | Procedural | Settled | The Düsseldorf Local Division permitted the withdrawal of both Truma's infringement action and CAN Srl Airxcel Europe's revocation counterclaim, following an out-of-court settlement. The proceedings were declared closed with no cost decision. Each party was reimbursed 60% of its court fees (EUR 6,600 each). The dispute value was set at EUR 500,000 each for the infringement action and revocation counterclaim. |
| 2025-05-30 | UPC_APP_57843/2024 | Hamburg LD | Generic application | Procedural | Procedural only | Final order of Hamburg Local Division in Visibly Inc. v Easee B.V. / Easee Holding B.V. / Yves Prevoo (EP 3 918 974) ordering the defendants (as counterclaimants for revocation) to provide joint security of EUR 75,000 for the claimant's legal costs, pursuant to Art. 69(4) UPCA and R. 158 RoP. The court held that Art. 69(4) UPCA does not oblige the defendant to provide security in the infringement action, but a claimant may request security from a defendant acting as counterclaimant in revocation proceedings. |
| 2025-04-17 | ORD_18772/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Generic Order | Procedural | Procedural only | The Düsseldorf Local Division, with the consent of all parties, stayed the infringement and revocation proceedings against TP-Link defendants 2 to 4 under R. 295(a) RoP, pending further developments. |
| 2025-04-17 | UPC_APP_17300/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Generic application | Procedural | Procedural only | Düsseldorf Local Division (17 April 2025) stayed the infringement and counterclaim for revocation proceedings between Atlas Global Technologies and Vantiva SA by consent of the parties pending EPO proceedings (R. 295(a) RoP). |