UPClytics

Cases

Workhorse listing across all UPC cases. Filters apply across tabs.

DateCaseDivisionActionMotionOutcomeSummary
2025-11-17UPC_CFI_1589/2025Dusseldorf LDApplication for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199EvidenceProcedural onlyThe Düsseldorf Local Division granted an ex parte order for inspection and preservation of evidence at the PRODUCTRONICA trade fair in Munich regarding a wire processing machine 'BZW-3005' by Jiangsu BOZHIWANG, prior to a main infringement action by Komax.
2025-04-09UPC_APP_13218/2025Dusseldorf LDGeneric applicationProceduralProcedural onlyApplication to correct a decision (R. 353 RoP) in infringement proceedings Tridonic GmbH & Co. KG v. CUPOWER entities. The correction request was partially granted: the phrase 'direkt oder indirekt' was struck from claim 7 of auxiliary requests 3, 5, 6 and 7 in the decision of 7 March 2025, as it was an obvious clerical error. The request to add attorney Alexander Bach to the heading of the decision was refused, as the named representatives were correct and there is no obligation to list all attorneys involved at any point.
2025-03-26ACT_14438/2025Dusseldorf LDApplication for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199EvidenceProcedural onlyThe Düsseldorf Local Division granted an ex-parte order for inspection and evidence preservation under R.199 RoP at trade fair stands of STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE, allowing representatives of OTEC to be present, concerning patent EP 2 983 864 B1 directed to a surface treatment process.
2025-03-07ACT_590302/2023Dusseldorf LDInfringement ActionInfringement meritsNot infringedDüsseldorf Local Division full merits judgment in an infringement action by Tridonic GmbH & Co KG against CUPOWER entities concerning EP 2 011 218 B1 (a patent relating to LED driver/control circuits). The court dismissed the infringement action in its entirety, finding that the accused LED power supply products do not fulfil feature 7.4 of the patent (decoupling element) because the capacitor C3 in the defendants' design does not achieve the complete electrical separation required by the claim – it remains continuously connected to the control unit regardless of switch state. The defendants' counterclaim for revocation was also dismissed (patent maintained). Costs were split: claimant bears costs of the infringement action; defendants bear costs of the revocation counterclaim equally.
2024-07-22UPC_APP_40530/2024Mannheim LDApplication Rop 333ProceduralProcedural onlyOrder by Mannheim Local Division panel (UPC_CFI_471/2023, 22 July 2024) on AYLO defendants' R. 333 RoP review application against the judge-rapporteur's confidentiality order. The panel upheld the access restrictions to technical information in the defendants' statement of defence, rejecting the claimants' request to exclude three of their designated persons from access.
2024-05-21ACT_589207/2023Munich LDApplication for provisional measuresPreliminary injunctionPI grantedThe Munich Local Division granted Dyson Technology Ltd. a preliminary injunction against SharkNinja Germany GmbH and SharkNinja Europe Limited, prohibiting them from offering or supplying certain handheld vacuum cleaners (models IW3611EU, IW3611DE, IW1611EU, IW1611DE, BU1120DE) in Germany and France that infringe EP 2 043 492, subject to Dyson commencing main proceedings within 31 calendar days or 20 working days.
2024-04-15ORD_18121/2024Dusseldorf LDGeneric OrderProceduralProcedural onlyThe Local Division Düsseldorf ordered a joint hearing of the main infringement action and the revocation counterclaim, finding that combined treatment was efficient and appropriate given the panel had already considered both infringement and validity issues in the prior provisional measures proceedings.