Decisions
| Date | Case | Division | Action | Motion | Outcome | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-05 | UPC_CFI_730/2025 | Hamburg LD | Application For Costs | Costs | Costs only | Hamburg Local Division cost assessment decision in the Nera Innovations v. Xiaomi proceedings. The Court determined the reimbursable costs for appeal proceedings under R. 220.2 RoP, holding that: (1) two authorised representatives are generally permissible but not necessary in R. 220.2 appeal on specific procedural issue; (2) the ceiling for reimbursable costs for main proceedings does not apply to R. 220.2 appeals on sub-issues; (3) travel expenses for at least one natural person are always reimbursable; and (4) even a successful party must generally bear its own costs in cost assessment proceedings. |
| 2026-01-05 | UPC_CFI_730/2025 | Hamburg LD | Application For Costs | Costs | Costs only | Duplicate of the Hamburg Local Division cost assessment decision (5 January 2026) in the Nera Innovations v. Xiaomi proceedings (UPC_CFI_730/2025), determining reimbursable costs for R. 220.2 RoP appeal proceedings on service of statement of claim. |
| 2025-07-10 | ACT_19746/2024 | Hamburg LD | Infringement Action | Infringement merits | Partially revoked | Final decision from Hamburg Local Division in infringement action by Nera Innovations Ltd. against Xiaomi entities concerning EP 2 642 632 (wireless power receiver). The infringement claim was dismissed as the patent was found to be substantially invalid. The patent was revoked in its main claim form, but maintained in a limited amended form (auxiliary requests 1 and 2). The counterclaim for revocation beyond those auxiliary requests was also dismissed. Costs of the infringement action borne by claimant; costs of counterclaim split 20% claimant / 80% defendants. Case value set at EUR 3,750,000. |
| 2025-07-10 | ACT_19746/2024 | Hamburg LD | Infringement Action | Procedural | Procedural only | Hamburg Local Division correction order (R. 353 RoP) correcting several factual errors in its judgment of 10 July 2025 in the Nera Innovations v. Xiaomi infringement proceedings. The corrections related to the patent transfer history (incorrect description of LG Innotek transfer) and heading numbering errors. |