UPClytics

Decisions

DateCaseDivisionActionMotionOutcomeSummary
2024-02-12UPC_CFI_395/2023Paris LDGeneric OrderProceduralProcedural onlyProcedural order from the Paris Local Division granting an extension and alignment of deadlines for filing the Statement of Defence in an infringement action by DexCom against 14 Abbott group defendants. The parties had orally agreed on a filing date at a case management meeting, which the Judge-Rapporteur considered reasonable. The order also confirmed service completion details for each defendant.
2024-01-30UPC_CFI_230/2023Paris LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Paris Local Division panel, on review under Rule 333 RoP, partially upheld Abbott's application by increasing the upper limit of the penalty for breach of the confidentiality club from EUR 50,000 to EUR 250,000, to achieve consistency with a parallel confidentiality order issued by the Munich Local Division in related proceedings.
2024-01-24UPC_CFI_230/2023Paris LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Paris Local Division full panel issued a procedural order in the Dexcom v. Abbott infringement case, rejecting Abbott's request for leave to appeal the judge-rapporteur's confidentiality order of 19 December 2023, finding it was a case management order subject to Rule 333 RoP review rather than a directly appealable order.
2023-12-19UPC_CFI_230/2023Paris LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Paris Local Division issued a procedural order in an infringement action brought by DexCom against multiple Abbott entities, granting Abbott's request to protect certain highly sensitive sales and revenue information contained in Abbott's statement of defence from public access.
2023-12-18UPC_CFI_358/2023Paris LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Paris Local Division issued a procedural order in an infringement action brought by Hewlett-Packard against Lama France, addressing Lama's requests regarding access to exhibits that were unreadable via the CMS and seeking an extension of the deadline to file its statement of defence. The order dealt exclusively with case management and access to documents.
2023-09-27UPC_CFI_240/2023Milan LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Milan Local Division rejected a Rule 262.1(b) request for case file access filed by a lawyer claiming to represent Himson Engineering, holding that a lawyer who is party-affiliated (even without formal appearance) is not a 'third party' within the meaning of Rule 262.1(b) and cannot access the file before service is complete.
2023-07-21UPC_CFI_241/2023Milan LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Milan Local Division ordered service of the Statement of Claim on defendants without transmitting the approximately 2,000 pages of exhibits, with the claimant's consent.
2023-07-21UPC_CFI_240/2023Milan LDInfringement ActionProceduralProcedural onlyThe Milan Local Division ordered that the Statement of Claim be served on the defendants without transmitting copies of the approximately 2,000 pages of attached exhibits, with the claimant's prior consent.
Page 2 of 2 · 58