UPClytics

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Patrik Rydman

Court of Appeal · Hamburg LD · Munich LD · Paris CD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
12
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Median time-to-decision (days)
156
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Pending8
  • Procedural only3
  • PI granted1
Roles
  • Technically Qualified Judge
  • Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • UPC_APP_51661/2024Procedural onlyDaedalus Prime LLC v Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
  • APL_39664/2024PI grantedAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sibio Technology Limited
  • 2025-09-24UPC_CoA_884/2025Procedural onlySibio Technology Limited v Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
  • 2025-02-17UPC_CFI_113/2025MediaTek Inc. (Headquarters) v Daedalus Prime LLC
  • 2024-07-26UPC_CFI_436/2024Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V. v Daedalus Prime LLC
  • 2024-07-04UPC_CoA_388/2024Procedural onlyAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sibio Technology Limited
  • 2024-07-03UPC_CoA_382/2024 v
  • 2024-05-30UPC_CFI_288/2024Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S. v Intel Corporation
  • 2024-03-26UPC_CFI_141/2024Reflection Investment B.V. v Panasonic Holdings Corporation
  • 2024-01-31CC_3274/2024Shamrock Mobile GmbH v Panasonic Holdings Corporation
  • 2023-08-01UPC_CFI_208/2023Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
  • 2023-08-01UPC_CFI_213/2023Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi Inc.