UPClytics

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Christoph Schober

Court of Appeal · Dusseldorf LD · Mannheim LD · Munich LD · Paris CD · Paris LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
13
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Median time-to-decision (days)
91
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Pending10
  • Withdrawn1
  • Procedural only1
  • Settled1
Roles
  • Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • UPC_APP_12551/2025WithdrawnHand Held Products, Inc. v Scandit AG
  • 2025-10-28UPC_CFI_1177/2025Xingmai Innovation Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. v Aiper Intelligent SARL
  • 2025-08-04UPC_APP_33803/2025Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Bernhard GANAHL v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • 2025-07-28UPC_APP_33805/2025Inventronics GmbH v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • 2025-07-28UPC_CFI_675/2025Julius Blum GmbH v ARTURO SALICE S.p.A.
  • 2025-07-28UPC_CFI_1340/2025ARTURO SALICE S.p.A. v Julius Blum GmbH
  • 2025-07-02UPC_CFI_611/2025Procedural onlyRobert Bosch GmbH v Grizzly Tools GmbH & Co. KG
  • 2024-09-11UPC_CoA_520/2024 v
  • 2024-04-19CC_21542/2024VitalAire GmbH v F. Hoffman-La Roche AG
  • 2024-04-19CC_20972/2024Rubin Medical ApS, c/o Diatom A/S v F. Hoffman-La Roche AG
  • 2024-03-28CC_16360/2024CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd v Tridonic GmbH & Co KG
  • 2024-01-02UPC_CFI_504/2023SettledF. Hoffman-La Roche AG v Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
  • 2023-10-16UPC_CFI_367/2023CEAD B.V. v BEGO Medical GmbH