Ausgangs-Basisraten

Keine Sachentscheidungen im aktuellen Umfang.

• Prozessuale & Unteranträge31

• Munich LD21 fällePI-Erteilungsquote: —Verletzungsquote: —Nichtigerklärungsquote: —
• Mannheim LD3 fällePI-Erteilungsquote: —Verletzungsquote: —Nichtigerklärungsquote: —
• Vienna LD3 fällePI-Erteilungsquote: —Verletzungsquote: —Nichtigerklärungsquote: —
• Dusseldorf LD2 fällePI-Erteilungsquote: —Verletzungsquote: —Nichtigerklärungsquote: —
• Hamburg LD1 fällePI-Erteilungsquote: —Verletzungsquote: —Nichtigerklärungsquote: —

• 2025-11-17UPC_CFI_885/2025Dusseldorf LDNur prozessualThe Düsseldorf Local Division ordered the release of an expert report obtained during an earlier trade fair inspection (EMO Hannover) to OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH, ruling on the redaction of trade secrets (prices, quantities, customer bank details) while allowing disclosure of technical measurements relevant to infringement.
• 2025-09-22UPC_CFI_885/2025Dusseldorf LDNur prozessualThe Düsseldorf Local Division granted OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH an ex parte inspection and evidence preservation order against STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L. at the Hannover Messe trade fair, concerning EP 2 983 864 B1 (surface finishing technology).
• 2025-07-22UPC_APP_23201/2025Munich LDNur prozessualMunich Local Division full panel order (Zigann/Pichlmaier/Schober) in inspection/evidence preservation proceedings (Beweissicherungsverfahren) between Nanoval GmbH & Co. KG (applicant) and ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH (respondent) concerning EP 3 083 107. The court dismissed ALD's application to revoke the inspection order of 3 February 2025 under R. 198.1 VerfO, finding that Nanoval had filed the main action (on 3 May 2025) within the prescribed time limit. The court clarified (headnotes) that: (1) the court has no discretion over the length of the R. 198.1 period but does have discretion over its start date; (2) the rapporteur may change the start date if the expert report is delivered late; (3) such a procedural order is subject to panel review under R. 333 VerfO within 15 days.
• 2025-05-28ORD_25482/2025Munich LDNur prozessualOrder of the Munich Local Division on a review (Rule 197.3 RoP) requested by ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH of an ex-parte evidence preservation and inspection order made on 3 February 2025 in favour of Nanoval GmbH & Co. KG concerning EP 3 083 107. After an oral hearing, the panel reviewed whether the evidence preservation order should be upheld or annulled.
• 2025-04-14UPC_APP_15498/2025Munich LDNur prozessualMunich Local Division order on Syngenta's application (R. 263 RoP) for leave to amend its claim in infringement proceedings concerning a pesticide patent to extend the territorial scope of its claim to Poland, Czech Republic and the United Kingdom. Sumi Agro opposed the amendment. The order addresses the conditions for late amendment of claim and territorial expansion under R. 263 RoP.
• 2025-01-13UPC_APP_223/2025UnknownZurückgenommenThe Munich Local Division allowed Avago Technologies' withdrawal of its application for provisional measures against Realtek Semiconductor. The ex parte order had not yet been served, and the proceedings were declared closed.
• 2025-01-07UPC_APP_66720/2024Munich LDZurückgenommenThe Munich Local Division granted Tesla's application to withdraw its counterclaim for revocation in the infringement proceedings brought by Avago Technologies, as both parties consented and no cost decision was requested; the revocation proceedings are formally terminated.
• 2025-01-07UPC_APP_66758/2024Munich LDZurückgenommenThe Munich Local Division allowed Avago Technologies International Sales' withdrawal of its infringement action against Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE. Each party bears its own costs.