ACT_3932/2024

DEVICE- ASSISTED SERVICES FOR PROTECTING NETWORK CAPACITY

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageDusseldorf LDInfringement Action—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
9.2	added matter	Bindend	The Court can reject a new line of arguments pursuant to R. 9.2 RoP in a case where the issue has been raised from the outset and the new argument is based on completely different passages of a lengthy document.
220.1	appeal	Bindend	An appeal against this decision may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party whose claims have been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, within two months of service of the decision (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1 (a) RoP, 224.1 (a) RoP).

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
73	appeal	Bindend	An appeal against this decision may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party whose claims have been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, within two months of service of the decision (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1 (a) RoP, 224.1 (a) RoP).
82	enforcement	Bindend	INFORMATION ON ENFORCEMENT (Art. 82 UPCA, Art. 37(2) UPCS, R. 118.8, 158.2, 354, 355.4 RoP)

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.