Übersicht · Eingereicht: —
ACT_44624/2024
GLAZING SYSTEM
VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageThe Hague LDInfringement Action—
Parteien
Kläger
- CITY GLASS AND GLAZING PRIVATE LIMITED
Vertreter: Joel Coles (Powell Gilbert); Peter Fitzpatrick (Powell Gilbert); Charlotte Malley (Powell Gilbert)
Beklagte
- MAARS HOLDING B.V.
- MAARS PARTITIONING SYSTEMS B.V.
- MAARS PROJECTEN B.V.
- MAARS FRANCE
Vertreter: Michiel Rijsdijk; M.j. Bosma; M.h. Luten; D.e. Colenbrander
Richter
- Panel of the Local Division The Hague
Patente
- EP 1 651 838
CPC-Codes: E06B3/549, E06B1/40, E06B3/5821, E06B3/62
Technologiebereich: Construction · Glazing Systems
Ausgang
Nicht verletztNicht verletzt
Eingereicht: —
Erste Entscheidung: 29. Aug. 2025
Sprache: —
The Local Division The Hague found that Maars' Horizon Products did not infringe City Glass's expired EP 1 651 838 (glazing system patent) because a key feature of the sole claim (feature 1.6 – self-locking mechanism) was not met; the revocation counterclaim was dismissed as the patent was held valid. Costs were agreed between the parties.
Ansprüche
Streitig1
Nicht verletzt1
Hinweise: Hague LD dismissed infringement of EP1651838 (glazing system); patent has only one claim; feature 1.6 (self-locking mechanism) not met by Horizon Products; revocation counterclaim also dismissed (patent valid).