UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

ACT_56003/2024

FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

NichtigkeitHauptnichtigkeitsklageMilan CDRevocation Action
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
355.2decision by default — sufficiency of evidence requirementBindendRule 355.2 RoP requires that, before issuing a decision by default against a defendant based on a procedural violation or failure to defend, the Court must verify that the case file contains sufficient, precise and consistent evidence to enable the judgment to be issued.

courtName.other · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
Administrative Committee decision 24 March 2023 Art. 1(3)cost cap applies per instance regardless of number of parties or patentsBindendPursuant to Article 1(3) of the decision of the Administrative Committee of 24 March 2023, the cap applies in each instance of the court proceedings, regardless of the number of parties or patents involved.
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.