ACT_561734/2023

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageHamburg LDInfringement Action—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
32	jurisdiction over counterclaim for revocation	Bindend	Art. 32 (1) e) and 65 (1) UPCA allow to attack the patent in its entirety by means of a counterclaim, even though single claims are not a part of the infringement requests.
63	proportionality of remedies	Bindend	the infringement action and its annex requests are to be dismissed without further consideration regarding proportionality under Article 63(1) of the UPCA.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
25	late filed validity attack / grounds of invalidity in counterclaim	Bindend	Art. 32 (1) e) and 65 (1) UPCA; Claim interpretation; Late filed validity attack, Rule 25 RoP
370.6	valuation of counterclaim for revocation for court fees	Bindend	The amount in dispute of the invalidity counterclaim is increased by up to 50 per cent in accordance with item I. 2. b) (2) (ii) of the 'Guidelines of the Administrative Committee for Determining Court Fees' (see Art. 36(3) UPCA, R. 370.6 RoP).

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.