ACT_571669/2023

NichtigkeitHauptnichtigkeitsklageParis CDRevocation Action—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
Article 65(3) UPCA	claim amendment	Bindend	the Court, according to Art. 65 (3) UPCA, limits the patent by a corresponding amendment of the claims and revokes it (only) in part
Article 76(1) UPCA	claim amendment	Bindend	Art. 76 (1) UPCA rules that the Court shall decide in accordance with the requests submitted by the parties.
Article 138(1)(c) EPC	added matter	Bindend	KEYWORDS: Person skilled in the art; Added matter; Art. 138 (1) (c) EPC; Art 123 (2) EPC; claim interpretation; Art 65.3 UPCA
Article 123(2) EPC	added matter	Bindend	KEYWORDS: Person skilled in the art; Added matter; Art. 138 (1) (c) EPC; Art 123 (2) EPC; claim interpretation; Art 65.3 UPCA
Article 69 UPCA	security for costs	Bindend	In accordance with Article 69 UPCA and Rule 118.5 RoP the Defendant, as the unsuccessful party, the Patent being revoked entirely, has to bear the legal costs

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
50.2	claim amendment	Bindend	Independent of an application to amend the patent as may be filed by the patent proprietor (R 50 (2) RoP) the Court, according to Art. 65 (3) UPCA, limits the patent
50.2	claim amendment	Bindend	according to R 50.2 RoP with R 30.1 (c) proposed amendments, if they are conditional like in the present case, must be reasonable in number

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.