ACT_579338/2023

PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageMannheim LDInfringement Action—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
24	statement of defence — obligation to present reasons why action shall fail	Bindend	the according facts have to be presented in the Statement of Defense and the Counterclaim for Revocation ... R. 24(g) RoP and the grounds for revocation have to be presented comprehensively, R. 25(1)(b) and (c) RoP
25	counterclaim for revocation — comprehensive presentation of grounds	Bindend	grounds for revocation have to be presented comprehensively, R. 25(1)(b) and (c) RoP whereas the following briefs have to limit themselves to a response to matters raised in the Reply, R. 29(c) and (d) RoP.
29	reply briefs limited to responding to matters raised	Bindend	the following briefs have to limit themselves to a response to matters raised in the Reply, R. 29(c) and (d) RoP.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
28	prior use right — applicable national law	Bindend	Where German Law is applicable upon a private prior use right according to Art. 28 UPCA, it is necessary that a firm and final decision to use the form of alleged prior use took place before the priority date.

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.