Übersicht · Eingereicht: —
ACT_597355/2023
METHODS FOR REDUCING LIPOPROTEIN(A) LEVELS BY ADMINISTERING AN INHIBITOR OF PROPROTEIN CONVERTASE SUBTILISIN KEXIN-9 (PCSK9)
VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageDusseldorf LDInfringement Action—
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
EPÜ-Artikel · 6
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 54(4) | novelty of second medical use – substance used for specific use not in prior art | Bindend | a substance or composition within the meaning of Art. 54(4) EPC is used for any specific use which is not comprised in the state of the art. |
| 54(5) | notional novelty afforded to second medical use claims | Bindend | In order to benefit from the notional novelty afforded by Art. 54(5) EPC, second medical use claims must relate to a specific use in a method according to Art. 53(c) EPC. |
| 53(c) | second medical use claims – method of treatment | Bindend | second medical use claims must relate to a specific use in a method according to Art. 53(c) EPC. |
| 73(1) | right to appeal within two months | Bindend | An appeal against this decision may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party whose claims have been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, within two months of service of the decision (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1 (a) RoP, 224.1 (a) RoP). |
| 69.4 | security for costs | Hintergrund | An authentic copy of the enforceable order will be issued by the Deputy-Registrar upon request of the enforcing party, R. 69 RegR. |
| 82 | enforcement of orders | Bindend | INFORMATION ON ENFORCEMENT (Art. 82 UPCA, Art. 37(2) UPCS, R. 118.8, 158.2, 354, 355.4 RoP) |
Verfahrensordnung · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 220.1 | time limit for appeal | Bindend | An appeal against this decision may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party whose claims have been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, within two months of service of the decision (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1 (a) RoP, 224.1 (a) RoP). |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.