UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

APL_14947/2025

HERBICIDE COMPOSITIONS

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 5

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
371.1court fees — timing of paymentBindendR. 371.1 RoP specifies that fixed fees shall be paid at the time of lodging the relevant pleading or application and that the payment shall be made to one of the bank accounts indicated by the Court.
371.4court fees — value-based feesBindendThe same rule applies to the payment of value-based fees (R. 371.4 RoP).
15.2court fees — lodging conditioned on paymentBindenda pleading or application will not be deemed lodged until the court fees have been paid (R. 15.2 RoP).
371.2court fees — proof of paymentBindendThis interpretation is confirmed by R. 371.2 RoP, which provides that proof of payment of court fees must be provided together with the relevant pleading or application.
213.1provisional measures — obligation to commence main proceedingsBindendSumi Agro submits – in summary – that the Munich Local Division adopted an incorrect interpretation of R. 15.2 RoP and R. 213.1 RoP, referring also to Art. 60(8) and Art. 70(2) UPCA and R. 371 RoP.

EPÜ-Artikel · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
70court fees — timing of paymentBindendArt. 70(2) UPCA and R. 371.1 RoP: court fees considered paid on time if transfer order given to bank at time of lodging the relevant pleading or application, provided payment is subsequently received.
60court feesHintergrundreferring also to Art. 60(8) and Art. 70(2) UPCA and R. 371 RoP.
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.