UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

APL_20002/2024

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.1
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 5

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
192preservation of evidence procedureBindendArticle 60 UPCA and Rules 192 et seq. RoP implies a request to disclose to the applicant the outcome of the measures, including the report written by the person who carried out the measures.
196use of evidence in merits proceedingsBindendThis follows from the fact that the legitimate purpose of the measures is the use of the evidence in proceedings on the merits of the case (Rules 196.2 and 199.2 RoP)
196confidential disclosure orderBindendRules 196.1 and 199.1 RoP provide that the Court may decide in its order that the evidence shall be disclosed to certain named persons and shall be subject to appropriate terms of non-disclosure.
196access during inspection executionBindendby granting access only to the representatives of the applicant whom the Court, pursuant to Rule 196.3(a) RoP, has authorised to be present during the execution of the measures
197review request; tacit approval for disclosureBindendthe failure to file a request for review under Rule 197.2 RoP implies tacit approval for full disclosure of the expert report and annexes

EPÜ-Artikel · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
60preservation of evidence / disclosureBindendAn application for the preservation of evidence or inspection of premises within the meaning of Article 60 UPCA and Rules 192 et seq. RoP implies a request to disclose to the applicant the outcome of the measures
60confidential information protectionBindendPursuant to Article 60(1) UPCA the order must be subject to the protection of confidential information
60revocation of evidence preservation measuresBindendPursuant to Article 60(8) UPCA the Court shall ensure that measures to preserve evidence or to inspect premises are revoked or otherwise cease to have effect, at the defendant's request

courtName.other · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
Directive 2004/48/EC Art. 7(1)confidential information in enforcement proceedingsHintergrundPursuant to Article 60(1) UPCA the order must be subject to the protection of confidential information (see also Article 7(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights)
Directive 2004/48/EC Art. 7(3)revocation time limit for evidence measuresHintergrundsee also Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/48/EC and Article 50(6) of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
TRIPS Art. 50(6)revocation time limit for provisional measuresHintergrundsee also Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/48/EC and Article 50(6) of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.