APL_40470/2024

TREATMENT OF PAROXYSMAL NOCTURNAL HEMOGLOBINURIA PATIENTS BY AN INHIBITOR OF COMPLEMENT

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.1—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
295	stay of proceedings	Bindend	This provision has been implemented in both R. 295(g) RoP, which refers to R. 118 RoP, and R. 295(a) RoP.
295	stay of proceedings	Bindend	Pursuant to Art. 33(10) UPCA and R. 295(a) RoP, the Court may stay proceedings relating to a patent which is also the subject of opposition proceedings before the EPO when a rapid decision may be expected from the EPO.
118	stay of proceedings	Bindend	R. 118 RoP contains provisions regarding decisions on the merits.
118.2	stay of proceedings	Bindend	R. 118.2(b) RoP and R. 295(g) RoP are therefore applicable when the case is ready for a decision.
222.2	new submissions on appeal	Bindend	Pursuant to R. 222.2 RoP, the Court of Appeal may disregard "requests, facts and evidence" which were not submitted by a party during the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.
295	stay of proceedings	Abgegrenzt	Under R. 295(m) RoP, the Court may stay proceedings "in any other case where the proper administration of justice so requires". However, this general ground for a stay is not applicable in the present case

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CoA_22/2024	stay of proceedings	Abgegrenzt	Unlike decisions in parallel revocation proceedings and opposition proceedings, which are not irreconcilable (Court of Appeal 28 May 20204, APL_3507/2024, UPC_CoA_22/2024, Carrier/BITZER, paragraph 25)

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
33	stay of proceedings	Bindend	Art. 33(10) UPCA provides that the Court may stay its proceedings if a rapid decision may be expected from the EPO.

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.