UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

APL_46747/2024

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
262.1(b)jurisdictionBindendHEADNOTES: A member of the public generally has an interest that written pleadings and evidence are made available.
262.1(b)jurisdictionBindendPublic access to written pleadings and evidence, R.262.1 (b) RoP, pending appeal, application for provisional measures, parallel proceedings
206urgencyHintergrundThis principle applies regardless of whether or not the rendered order concerns an application for provisional measures (R.206 RoP).

UPC-Berufungsgericht · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
Ocado v AutostorejurisdictionBindendThe general interest includes the protection of the integrity of proceedings (Ocado v Autostore, para 43).
Ocado v AutostorejurisdictionBindendAs the Court of Appeal in Ocado v Autostore (para 47) also has stated, a member of the public generally has an interest that written pleadings and evidence are made available.

EPÜ-Artikel · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
45jurisdictionBindendThe interests mentioned in Art. 45 UPCA include the protection of confidential information and personal data but are not limited thereto.

EuGH · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
C-514/07jurisdictionÜberzeugendThe CJEU´s Judgment API v Commission (21 September 2010, C-514/07) cited by Abbott does not suggest that the access to these documents should be withheld as long as the case is pending.

UPC (Erstinstanz) · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CFI_130/2024jurisdictionHintergrundLocal Division The Hague, 29 July 2024, ORD_39917/2024, App_39761/2024, UPC_CFI_130/2024; ACT_14944/2024.
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.