UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

APL_58177/2024

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER A NETWORK USING A HARDWARE SECURITY ENGINE

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
262Aaccess to confidential information; restricted personsBindendPursuant to R. 262A.6 RoP the number of persons to whom access is restricted shall be no greater than necessary in order to ensure compliance with the rights of the parties to the legal proceedings
262Aconfidential information protection orderBindendthe fact that the US attorneys are neither employees of Daedalus, nor representatives within the meaning of Art. 48 UPCA, does not preclude them from having full access to the confidential information under R. 262A RoP.

EPÜ-Artikel · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
48representation before UPCBindendR. 262A.6 RoP does not require that the person to whom access is given be an employee of a party or a representative within the meaning of Art. 48 of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (hereinafter: UPCA).
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.