UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

APL_588422/2023

VAPORIZATION DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
242.1costsBindendRule 242.1 RoP is to be interpreted to mean that if the decision of the Court of Appeal is not a final order or decision concluding an action, the Court of Appeal, in the case at hand, will not issue an order for costs
8.5party identificationBindendit must have been clear to the appellant that the statements were directed against it, see Rule 8.5(a), (c), 8.6 and Rule 42 RoP

EPÜ-Artikel · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
69costsBindendwhen, in the final decision on the action at hand, the Court determines whether and to what extent a party must bear the costs of the other party because it was unsuccessful within the meaning of Article 69 UPCA.
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.