Übersicht · Eingereicht: —
APL_588426/2023
VAPORIZATION DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS
BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2—
Parteien
Kläger
- NJOY Netherlands B.V.(Altria Group)
Vertreter: Hon.-Prof. Dr. Henrik Holzapfel (McDermott Will & Emery)
Beklagte
- Juul Labs International, Inc.
Vertreter: Bernhard Thum (Thum & Partner); Jonas Weickert (Thum & Partner); Andreas Mötsch (Thum & Partner); Tobias Wuttke (Bardehle Pagenberg Partnerschaft mbB)
Richter
- Klaus GrabinskiPresident of the Court of Appeal
- Françoise BarutelLegally qualified judge
- Peter BlokLegally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
Patente
- EP 3 498 115
- EP 3 504 990
- EP 3 504 989
- EP 3 504 991
- EP 3 430 921
CPC-Codes: A61M2016/0021, A61M2205/8237, A61M2205/3606, H02J7/00, A61M15/0015, A61M15/002, A61M15/0016, A24F7/02, A61M2205/3331, A24F40/485, A61M15/06, A61M2205/8206…
Sektor: Electric Techniques
Ausgang
Abgewiesen
Eingereicht: —
Erste Entscheidung: 3. Apr. 2024
Sprache: —
Court of Appeal order rejecting Juul Labs International's appeal against the Court of First Instance order allowing rectification of the defendant's name in five revocation actions filed by NJOY Netherlands B.V. (originally naming Juul Labs, Inc. instead of registered proprietor Juul Labs International, Inc.). The Court of Appeal held the rectification was permissible since the appellant was not unreasonably prejudiced. No costs order was made in this interlocutory appeal, to be deferred to the final merits decision. Appeal rejected.