APL_596007/2023

DIGITALLY OVERLAYING AN IMAGE WITH ANOTHER IMAGE

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.1—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
83	jurisdiction	Bindend	The term 'action' in Art. 83 UPCA refers not only to infringement and revocation actions, but to all actions mentioned in Art. 32 UPCA over which the UPC has jurisdiction.
32	jurisdiction	Bindend	The term 'action' in Art. 83 UPCA refers not only to infringement and revocation actions, but to all actions mentioned in Art. 32 UPCA over which the UPC has jurisdiction.
83	jurisdiction	Bindend	the sentence "Unless an action has already been brought before a national court" in Art. 83(4) UPCA must be understood to refer to an action brought before a national court during the transitional regime.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
5.8	jurisdiction	Abgegrenzt	Supponor has argued that its interpretation of the term 'action' in Art. 83 UPCA is confirmed by Rule 5.8 RoP, as it is clear from its wording that 'action' in this Rule must also be understood to include actions brought before a national court prior to the transitional period.
1.1	jurisdiction	Bindend	in that situation, in accordance with R.1.1 RoP, the provision of the UPCA shall prevail.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
Art. 31(2)(b) Vienna Convention	jurisdiction	Hintergrund	the Court of Appeal appreciates that the Rules of Procedure may be considered as an instrument related to the UPCA as meant in Art. 31 (2) lit (b) Vienna Convention.

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.