APL_64374/2024

FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.1—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
62	continuation of infringement — basis for provisional measures	Bindend	Continuation of infringement (Art. 62(1) UPCA)
69	costs — reasonable and proportionate costs borne by unsuccessful party	Bindend	Pursuant to Art. 69(1) UPCA, reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses incurred by the successful party shall, as a general rule, be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless equity requires otherwise.
69	cost apportionment where party succeeds only in part	Bindend	Pursuant to Art. 69(2) UPCA, where a party succeeds only in part or in exceptional circumstances, the Court may order that the costs be apportioned equitably or that the parties bear their own costs.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CoA_Sumi_v_Syngenta	burden of proof on defendant for security for enforcement	Bindend	The burden of proof generally rests on the defendant (see UPC CoA, Sumi v Syngenta, para. 114).

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CFI_380/2024	impugned order dismissing provisional measures application	Hintergrund	Milan Central Division, 22 November 2024, ORD_62486/2024, App_39640/2024, UPC_CFI_380/2024

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.