ORD_3876/2025

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeVerfahrensführungsanordnungenParis LDGeneric Order—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
33	jurisdiction	Bindend	the expression "may be" means that the defendant has the possibility in his statement of defence to challenge the validity of the patent that is asserted against him
33	jurisdiction	Bindend	the last sentence of Article 33.4, which states that an action for revocation of a patent must only be raised before the local division in charge of the infringement action for that patent.
33	jurisdiction	Hintergrund	it refers to a situation provided for in Article 33.5 UPCA (CD first seized), which is different from that provided for in Article 33.4 UPCA.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CFI_1/2023	jurisdiction	Abgegrenzt	the order ruled by the Central Division of Munich (CD Munich, order 560432 case CFI_1/2023) to which PHOTON WAVE refers in support of its reasoning is not relevant to the present case since it refers to a situation provided for in Article 33.5 UPCA

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
313.2	intervention	Bindend	taking into account the fact that the intervener (in accordance with Rule 313.2 RoP) can only intervene to support the procedural strategy of the defendant

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.