ORD 42503/2024

—·EP2331036: DEVICE FOR TREATING NIGHT TIME BREATHING PROBLEMS

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
Not identified (individual claimant, name redacted)
Vertreter: C. Ronse; K. Claeyé; M.w. Rijsdijk; D.e. Colenbrander
Beklagte
OrthoApnea S.L.
Vivisol B BV
Vertreter: Van den Horst; Niemeijer
Division: Brussels LD
Richter: Samuel Granata · Presiding Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
Margot Kokke · Legally Qualified Judge
Andras Kupecz · Legally Qualified Judge
Technology: Pharmaceutical & Medical
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 19. Juli 2024

Entscheidungen

2024-07-19
Generic Order
The Brussels Local Division (full panel) dismissed the respondents' application for review under R. 333 RoP of an earlier judge-rapporteur order that had denied their objection against the claimant's equivalence arguments introduced in the reply. The panel upheld the judge-rapporteur's finding that introducing an infringement argument based on equivalence in the reply did not constitute a fundamental new ground requiring prior leave under R. 263.1 RoP.
Rechtsfragen:Review of judge-rapporteur order (R. 333 RoP)Admissibility of equivalence arguments introduced in replyFundamental change of claim vs. new argument (R. 263.1 RoP)

Dokumente