UPC APP 13218/2025

—·EP2011218B1

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien: Kläger
Tridonic GmbH & Co KG
Vertreter: Markus B. Bölling (Mitscherlich Patent- und Rechtsanwälte); Christian Kraeh (Mitscherlich Patent- und Rechtsanwälte); Alexander Bach (Mitscherlich Patent- und Rechtsanwälte)
Beklagte
CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
CUPOWER Europe GmbH
Vertreter: Eva Geschke (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Jan-Caspar Maiers (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB)
Division: Dusseldorf LD
Richter: Berenice Thom · Legally qualified judge
Sabine Klepsch · Presiding judge
Peter Agergaard · Legally qualified judge
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 9. Apr. 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-04-09
Generic application
Application to correct a decision (R. 353 RoP) in infringement proceedings Tridonic GmbH & Co. KG v. CUPOWER entities. The correction request was partially granted: the phrase 'direkt oder indirekt' was struck from claim 7 of auxiliary requests 3, 5, 6 and 7 in the decision of 7 March 2025, as it was an obvious clerical error. The request to add attorney Alexander Bach to the heading of the decision was refused, as the named representatives were correct and there is no obligation to list all attorneys involved at any point.
Rechtsfragen:Correction of obvious errors in decisions (R. 353 RoP)Scope of correction vs. amendment of decision

Dokumente