UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 2249/2024

·EP3926698: LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Bolko Ehlgen (Linklaters LLP); Julia Schönbohm (Linklaters LLP)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Dirk Jestaedt (Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben Partnerschaft mbB)
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Richter
Technology
Semiconductor Devices
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
20. Jan. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-01-20
    Generic application

    The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in Seoul Viosys v. expert e-Commerce, rejecting the defendants' application for an extension of the deadline to file their statement of defence and counterclaim for revocation, applying the strict UPC time limits regime.

    Rechtsfragen:Rule 9.3 RoP: extension of time limits for statement of defenceStrict time limits regime under UPC RoP
Dokumente
  • 2024-01-20%20LD%20D%C3%BCsseldorf%20UPC_CFI%20363-2023%20ORD_2555-2024%20App_2249-2024%20anonymized.pdf2024-01-20DE