- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusKlage abgewiesenVerfahrensartVorbescheidKategorieVorab-Einrede
- Parteien
- Beklagte
- Qualcomm IncorporatedUnternehmen
- Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.Unternehmen
- Qualcomm Germany GmbHUnternehmen
Vertreter- Johannes Heselberger-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Munich LD
- Richter
- Technologie
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 25. Aug. 2025
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Gesperrt |
| Richter Daniel Voss | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Network System Technologies LLC (77 Verfahren)·Qualcomm Group (28 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 13 weitere Verfahren
UPC CoA 68/2026·UPC CoA 69/2026·UPC CoA 70/2026·UPC CoA 71/2026·UPC CoA 72/2026 und 8 weitere
22 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
UPC CoA 265/2024·UPC CoA 217/2024·UPC CoA 218/2024·UPC CoA 219/2024·UPC CoA 220/2024 und 17 weitere
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
- 2025-08-25Preliminary objectionÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: Preliminary objection by Qualcomm entities (Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Technologies Inc., Qualcomm Germany GmbH) challenging jurisdiction dismissed by judge-rapporteur. Defendants argued that the withdrawal of the opt-out of EP 1 552 399 by a UPC representative (Ms Huang) was invalid for lack of power of attorney. The court held that a registered UPC representative (Art. 48 UPCA, R. 5.3(b)(i) RoP) does not need a written mandate for opt-out withdrawal; formal requirements were met and the patent falls within UPC jurisdiction. Appeal against this decision was not allowed.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
- Validity of opt-out withdrawal by UPC representative without written mandate
- Preliminary objection on jurisdiction (R. 19.1 RoP)
- Scope of R. 5.3(b)(i) RoP and Art. 48 UPCA
- B7344DA79E3C4C83D129D96945FD07B1_en.pdf2025-08-25EN