Übersicht · Eingereicht: —
UPC_APP_22897/2024
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING TRANSACTIONS
SonstigeVorab-EinredeMunich LDPreliminary objection—
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
Verfahrensordnung · 5
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | preliminary objection scope; opt-out withdrawal | Bindend | Rule 19.1 (a) RoP does not mean that the Defendant of an infringement action may raise any objection in the context of an application to opt out and the withdrawal of an opt-out |
| 5 | withdrawal of opt-out by UPC representative | Bindend | where a UPC representative is acting in accordance with Rule 5.3 (b) (i) RoP, a written mandate, a power of attorney or any other power or representation is not a necessary condition for the effectiveness of the withdrawal of an opt-out |
| 5 | formal requirements for opt-out withdrawal | Bindend | The formal requirements for the withdrawal of the opt-out pursuant to Rule 5.7 RoP in conjunction with Rule 5.3 RoP have been met. |
| 5 | conditions barring opt-out withdrawal | Bindend | the withdrawal is entered in the register and the requirements of Rule 5.8 RoP are not met. |
| 285 | challenge to representative's power of representation | Bindend | Its Order of 18 September 2024, which was issued in parallel infringement proceedings, does address the principles of statement, substantiation and proof in the context of Rule 285.1 RoP if the power of representation is challenged. |
EPÜ-Artikel · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | representation before UPC | Bindend | Rule 5.3 (b) (i) RoP, a written mandate … is not a necessary condition for the effectiveness of the withdrawal of an opt-out |
UPC-Berufungsgericht · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_265/2024 | principles for challenging power of representation under R.285.1 RoP | Überzeugend | Its Order of 18 September 2024, which was issued in parallel infringement proceedings, does address the principles of statement, substantiation and proof in the context of Rule 285.1 RoP |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.