- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieSonstige prozessuale
- Parteien
- Kläger
- CEAD B.V.Unternehmen
- CEAD USA B.V.Unternehmen
Vertreter- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Alexander Rubusch-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Paris CD
- Richter
- Technologie
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Mechanical engineeringOther special machines
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 10. Mai 2024
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
| Paris CD | Gesperrt |
| Richter Maximilian Haedicke | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: CEAD B.V. (4 Verfahren)·BEGO Medical GmbH (4 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 3 weitere Verfahren
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
- 2024-05-10
Zusammenfassung: Paris Central Division procedural order (judge-rapporteur Haedicke) in a revocation action by CEAD B.V. and CEAD USA B.V. against BEGO Medical GmbH concerning EP 2 681 034 B1, addressing a request by CEAD (as claimant in the Dutch-language revocation proceedings) for simultaneous interpretation into Dutch (alternatively English) at the interim hearing (29 May 2024) and oral hearing (23 August 2024). The court rejected the request for simultaneous interpretation under R. 109 VerfO, holding that the right to be heard is sufficiently protected where the party's authorised representative is fluent in the language of the proceedings (German). Simultaneous interpretation at the parties' own cost, however, was permitted.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
- Request for simultaneous interpretation (R. 109 VerfO / Art. 51(2) UPCA)
- Right to be heard vs. language of proceedings requirements
- Court-ordered vs. party-funded interpretation
- 875E6EB688D179A918197DD9FD96D501_de.pdf2024-05-10DE