Alle Fälle anzeigen
UPC APP 35917/2025
—·EP2624031B1
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieSonstige prozessuale
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter: Matthias Sonntag (Gleiss Lutz Hootz Hirsch PartmbB, Düsseldorf); Benedikt Burger (Gleiss Lutz Hootz Hirsch PartmbB, Düsseldorf); Mischa Krumm (Gleiss Lutz Hootz Hirsch PartmbB, Düsseldorf)BeklagteVertreter: Frank Peterreins (Peterreins Schley); Jan-Malte Schley (Peterreins Schley)
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Richter
- Jule Schumacher · Legally qualified judge (judge-rapporteur)
- Peter Agergaard · Legally qualified judge
- Anders Hansson · Technically qualified judge
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 12. Sept. 2025
Entscheidungen
- 2025-09-12Generic application
Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in infringement proceedings (with counterclaim for revocation and patent amendment application) concerning EP 2 624 031 B1. The order addressed TRUMPF's submissions, partly allowing and partly disregarding them under Rule 9.2 RoP: sections on claim interpretation and patent validity were allowed as part of the rejoinder to the revocation counterclaim; however, submissions on claim abandonment were excluded as outside the permitted written exchange. The claimant's request for leave to file additional briefs on claim abandonment under Rule 36 RoP was rejected.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of submissions in rejoinder to revocation counterclaim under Rule 9.2 RoPLeave to file additional briefs under Rule 36 RoPClaim abandonment in infringement proceedingsScope of duplik in revocation proceedings
Dokumente
- E95546D5ABC6C6356C0530DC047F8DC1_de.pdf2025-09-12DE