UPC APP 35917/2025
EP2624031 · Method and Arrangement for generating a laser beam having a differing beam profile characteristic by means of a multi-clad fibre
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieSonstige prozessuale
- Parteien
- Kläger
- TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SEUnternehmen
Vertreter- Matthias Sonntag-Gleiss Lutz
- Benedikt Burger-Gleiss Lutz
- Mischa Krumm-Gleiss Lutz
- Andreas Eiselemitwirkend-Witte, Weller & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
Beklagte- IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KGUnternehmen
Vertreter- Frank Peterreins-Peterreins Schley
- Jan-Malte Schley-Peterreins Schley
- Felix Glöckler-Peterreins Schley
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technologie
- InstrumentsOptics
- Mechanical engineeringMachine tools
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 12. Sept. 2025
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Gesperrt |
| Richter Jule Schumacher | Gesperrt |
| Richter Peter Agergaard | Gesperrt |
| Richter Anders Hansson | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE (4 Verfahren)·IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG (9 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 3 weitere Verfahren
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Dusseldorf LD·2025
- 2025-09-12
Zusammenfassung: Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in infringement proceedings (with counterclaim for revocation and patent amendment application) concerning EP 2 624 031 B1. The order addressed TRUMPF's submissions, partly allowing and partly disregarding them under Rule 9.2 RoP: sections on claim interpretation and patent validity were allowed as part of the rejoinder to the revocation counterclaim; however, submissions on claim abandonment were excluded as outside the permitted written exchange. The claimant's request for leave to file additional briefs on claim abandonment under Rule 36 RoP was rejected.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- Admissibility of submissions in rejoinder to revocation counterclaim under Rule 9.2 RoP
- Leave to file additional briefs under Rule 36 RoP
- Claim abandonment in infringement proceedings
- Scope of duplik in revocation proceedings
- E95546D5ABC6C6356C0530DC047F8DC1_de.pdf2025-09-12DE