UPC APP 44953/2024

—

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien: Kläger
SES-imagotag SA
Vertreter: Alexandre Hoffmann
Beklagte
Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd
Hanshow Germany GmbH
Hanshow France SAS
Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Vertreter: Roland Küppers
Division: Munich LD
Richter: —
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 18. Okt. 2024

Entscheidungen

2024-10-18
Nur KostenKostenGeneric application
Decision of Munich Local Division in SES-imagotag SA v Hanshow Technology / Hanshow Germany / Hanshow France / Hanshow Netherlands on Hanshow's application for costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal (APL_8/2024, UPC_CoA_1/2024). The court dismissed the costs application as inadmissible because it was not filed within the time limit. The court also rejected Hanshow's application for reinstatement (Wiedereinsetzung) as it had not been filed at the competent court (first instance) and the reinstatement fee had not been paid.
Rechtsfragen:Time limit for filing costs application – admissibilityReinstatement under R. 320 RoP as lex specialis over R. 9.3(a) RoPRequirement to file reinstatement at the competent (first instance) courtPayment of reinstatement fee under R. 320.2 / R. 371 RoP

Dokumente