UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 44953/2024

Verfahrensdetails
Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
  • Alexandre Hoffmann
Beklagte
Vertreter
  • Roland Küppers
Division
Munich LD
Richter
—
Sprache
—
Erste Entscheidung
18. Okt. 2024
Im Vergleich
Wie lange das Gericht bis zu einer ersten Entscheidung braucht.
Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC124
Munich LDGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: SES-imagotag SA (9 Verfahren)·Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd (6 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2024-10-18

    Zusammenfassung: Decision of Munich Local Division in SES-imagotag SA v Hanshow Technology / Hanshow Germany / Hanshow France / Hanshow Netherlands on Hanshow's application for costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal (APL_8/2024, UPC_CoA_1/2024). The court dismissed the costs application as inadmissible because it was not filed within the time limit. The court also rejected Hanshow's application for reinstatement (Wiedereinsetzung) as it had not been filed at the competent court (first instance) and the reinstatement fee had not been paid.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • Time limit for filing costs application – admissibility
    • Reinstatement under R. 320 RoP as lex specialis over R. 9.3(a) RoP
    • Requirement to file reinstatement at the competent (first instance) court
    • Payment of reinstatement fee under R. 320.2 / R. 371 RoP
Dokumente
  • C90EA8BC4ADDB9866D94C403236D25D2_de.pdf2024-10-18DE