View all cases
UPC APP 44953/2024
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Hanshow Technology Co. LtdOperating co.
- Hanshow Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Hanshow France SASOperating co.
- Hanshow Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Roland Küppers
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- —
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Oct 18, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
At the UPC: SES-imagotag SA (9 cases)·Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd (6 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
Decisions
- 2024-10-18
Summary: Decision of Munich Local Division in SES-imagotag SA v Hanshow Technology / Hanshow Germany / Hanshow France / Hanshow Netherlands on Hanshow's application for costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal (APL_8/2024, UPC_CoA_1/2024). The court dismissed the costs application as inadmissible because it was not filed within the time limit. The court also rejected Hanshow's application for reinstatement (Wiedereinsetzung) as it had not been filed at the competent court (first instance) and the reinstatement fee had not been paid.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Time limit for filing costs application – admissibility
- Reinstatement under R. 320 RoP as lex specialis over R. 9.3(a) RoP
- Requirement to file reinstatement at the competent (first instance) court
- Payment of reinstatement fee under R. 320.2 / R. 371 RoP
Documents
- C90EA8BC4ADDB9866D94C403236D25D2_de.pdf2024-10-18DE