UPC APP 44953/2024

—

Case details: Status
—
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties: Claimants
SES-imagotag SA
Reps: Alexandre Hoffmann
Respondents
Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd
Hanshow Germany GmbH
Hanshow France SAS
Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Reps: Roland Küppers
Division: Munich LD
Judges: —
Language: —
First decided: Oct 18, 2024

Decisions

2024-10-18
Costs onlyCostsGeneric application
Decision of Munich Local Division in SES-imagotag SA v Hanshow Technology / Hanshow Germany / Hanshow France / Hanshow Netherlands on Hanshow's application for costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal (APL_8/2024, UPC_CoA_1/2024). The court dismissed the costs application as inadmissible because it was not filed within the time limit. The court also rejected Hanshow's application for reinstatement (Wiedereinsetzung) as it had not been filed at the competent court (first instance) and the reinstatement fee had not been paid.
Legal issues:Time limit for filing costs application – admissibilityReinstatement under R. 320 RoP as lex specialis over R. 9.3(a) RoPRequirement to file reinstatement at the competent (first instance) courtPayment of reinstatement fee under R. 320.2 / R. 371 RoP

Documents