Alle Fälle anzeigen
UPC APP 55674/2024
—·EP2043492: A HAND-HELD CLEANING APPLIANCE
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieSonstige prozessuale
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter: Constanze Krenz (DLA Piper); David Kleß (DLA Piper); Joschua Fiedler (DLA Piper)BeklagteVertreter: Wolrad Prinz zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Christopher Stothers (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Kilian Seidel (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Caroline Horstmann (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- Rian Kalden · Presiding judge
- Ingeborg Simonsson · Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
- Patricia Rombach · Legally qualified judge
- Graham Ashley · Technically qualified judge
- Max Tilmann · Technically qualified judge
- Technology
- Furniture & Household
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 21. Okt. 2024
Entscheidungen
- 2024-10-21BeweisGeneric application
The Court of Appeal refused SharkNinja's application to admit new evidence (an exhibit from US proceedings, FBD 29) in the appeal from the Munich Local Division in Dyson's infringement action, finding that the evidence was not sufficiently relevant to the appellate issues concerning patent claim interpretation and that no justified reason for late submission had been established.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of new evidence in appeal under R. 222.2 RoPTiming and justified reasons for late submission of evidenceEstoppel by conduct (contradictory claim interpretation in US proceedings)
Dokumente
- 103C748D13D898D4654633C069694575_de.pdf2024-10-21DE