Übersicht · Eingereicht: —
UPC_APP_55795/2024
PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAID PROTECTIVE DEVICE
SonstigeVorab-EinredeMilan LDPreliminary objection—
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
EuGH · 3
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 71a Brussels I Recast | jurisdiction — UPC deemed court of a Member State | Bindend | The UPC 'shall be deemed to be a court of a Member State' pursuant the Article 71a of the Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012 (recast) as amended by Regulation (EU) 542/2014. |
| C-339/2022 | jurisdiction — UPC universal jurisdiction over European patents where defendant domiciled in UPC state | Bindend | In light of Court of Justice decision in case C-339/2022, 25 February 2025, UPC Milan Local Division has universal jurisdiction to adjudicate on infringement issues related to European patents over the defendants domiciled in Italy |
| Articles 4(1), 71a, 71b Brussels I Recast | jurisdiction | Bindend | pursuant to Articles 4(1) and 71a and 71b of the Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012 (recast) as amended by Regulation (EU) 542/2014. |
EPÜ-Artikel · 3
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | jurisdiction | Bindend | UPC Milan Local Division has universal jurisdiction to adjudicate on infringement issues related to European patents over the defendants domiciled in Italy pursuant to Article 32 UPCA |
| 31 | jurisdiction | Bindend | Keywords rule 19 RoP, art. 31 and 34 UPCA, Jurisdiction, Spain |
| 34 | territorial scope — non-UPC validated patents | Bindend | Art. 34 UPCA must be interpreted consistently; this rule seems rather only regulate the case in which the EP is not validated in the entire territory of the UPC. |
Verfahrensordnung · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | jurisdiction | Bindend | Keywords rule 19 RoP, art. 31 and 34 UPCA, Jurisdiction, Spain |
UPC (Erstinstanz) · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_355/2023 | jurisdiction — non-UPC validated patents | Überzeugend | see Local Division Düsseldorf, Decision dated 28 January.2025, Fujifilm v Kodak (UPC_CFI_355/2023). |
UPC-Berufungsgericht · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_388/2024 | jurisdiction — territorial scope distinguished | Abgegrenzt | This solution is not affected by the CoA decision (UPC_CoA_388/2024, APL_39884/2024), that revoked a preliminary injunction erroneously extended by the First Instance Court (Local Division of the Hague) to Ireland. |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.