UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

UPC_APP_58871/2024

SonstigeVorab-EinredeHamburg LDPreliminary objection
Parteien

Kläger

  • Visibly Inc.
Vertreter: Marc Grunwald

Beklagte

  • Easee B.V.
  • Yves Prevoo
  • Easee Holding B.V.
Vertreter: Wim Maas
Richter
  • [judge-Rapporteur]Judge-Rapporteur
Patente
  • [Not specified in excerpt]
Ausgang
Abgewiesen
Eingereicht:
Erste Entscheidung: 18. Dez. 2024
Sprache:

Procedural order of the Hamburg Local Division rejecting a preliminary objection (Rule 19 RoP) filed by defendants Easee B.V., Yves Prevoo (director), and Easee Holding B.V. against Visibly Inc.'s patent infringement action. The court rejected the jurisdictional challenge, holding: (1) an alleged patent infringement constitutes a tort under Art. 7(2) Brussels I recast Regulation, giving the UPC jurisdiction over director liability claims as well; (2) the question whether a director can be held personally liable is a matter of the merits, not of jurisdiction. The court confirmed the Hamburg Local Division's competence under Art. 33(1)(a) UPCA based on the place where the alleged infringement may occur (Germany). Leave to appeal was granted.