UPC APP 594342/2023

—·EP3096315: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien: Kläger
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
OROPE Germany GmbH
Vertreter: Rien Broekstra (Vossius & Brinkhof UPC Litigators); Andreas Kramer (Vossius & Brinkhof UPC Litigators)
Beklagte
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Vertreter: Miriam Kiefer (Kather Augenstein)
Division: Court of Appeal
Richter: Rian Kalden · Vorsitzende Richterin und rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
Ingeborg Simonsson · Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin und Berichterstatterin
Patricia Rombach · Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 20. Dez. 2023

Entscheidungen

2023-12-20
AbgewiesenBerufungsentscheidungApplication for an Order for expedition of an appeal (RoP225(e))
German-language Court of Appeal order (Second Panel) rejecting OPPO's request for shortening of the time period for the Statement of Response (R. 9.3(b) RoP) in the appeal concerning the language of proceedings for EP 3 096 315. Same outcome and reasoning as App_594327/2023 and App_594339/2023. Proceedings closed.
Rechtsfragen:Expedition of appeal proceedings (R. 225(e) RoP)Shortening of time period for Statement of Response (R. 9.3(b) RoP)Proportionality, fairness and due processLanguage of proceedings dispute
2023-12-20
AbgewiesenBerufungsentscheidungApplication for an Order for expedition of an appeal (RoP225(e))
English translation of the Court of Appeal order (Second Panel) rejecting OPPO's request for shortening of the time period for the Statement of Response in the appeal concerning the language of proceedings for EP 3 096 315. Same reasoning as App_594327/2023. Proceedings closed.
Rechtsfragen:Expedition of appeal proceedings (R. 225(e) RoP)Shortening of time period for Statement of Response (R. 9.3(b) RoP)Proportionality, fairness and due processLanguage of proceedings dispute

Dokumente