UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 61580/2024

·EP3110069: DEVICE- ASSISTED SERVICES FOR PROTECTING NETWORK CAPACITY

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Vorbescheid
Kategorie
Vorab-Einrede
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Schneider (Eisenführ Speiser)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Wunderlich (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Boris Kreye (Bird & Bird LLP)
Division
Munich LD
Richter
Technology
Telecommunications
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
20. Juni 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-06-20
    AbgewiesenZuständigkeitPreliminary objection

    Preliminary objection by Motorola Mobility LLC, Motorola International Sales LLC, Motorola Mobility Germany GmbH and Flextronics International Europe B.V. challenging jurisdiction of Munich Local Division was rejected in Headwater Research LLC v. Motorola entities (EP 3 110 069). The court held: (1) Art. 33(1)(a) UPCA jurisdiction is established by the claimant's credible assertion of infringement in Germany, including delivery of devices; (2) Art. 33(1)(b) sentence 2 UPCA does not narrow the rule for multiple defendants where each infringes in Germany or has seat there; (3) Flextronics as logistics provider for Motorola was plausibly alleged to have participated in infringement, supporting Munich jurisdiction. Appeal not allowed.

    Rechtsfragen:Jurisdiction of UPC local division (Art. 33(1)(a) and (b) UPCA)Interpretation of Art. 33(1)(b) sentence 2 for multiple defendantsInfringement location as basis for jurisdictionParticipation of logistics provider in infringement
Dokumente
  • BC3661AD2B4FE393414880B57FCD1C58_de.pdf2025-06-20GERMAN