Übersicht · Eingereicht: —
UPC_APP_8708/2024
CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS
SonstigeVorab-EinredeParis CDPreliminary objection—
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
Verfahrensordnung · 3
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 295 | procedural | Bindend | he patent as a whole or the German portion thereof. 63. Article 30 (1) Brussels I Reg recast is not applicable. 64. In accordance with Art. 33 (10) UPCA and Rule 295 RoP, the UPC may only stay its proceedings in cases involving EPO opposition pro |
| 49.1 | procedural | Bindend | foundation for staying the proceedings before this court. No Time extension 66. The deadline for the lodging of a Defence to revocation is stipulated by R. 49.1 RoP. This Rule forms part of an elaborate regime of deadlines set out in the RoP. |
| 9.3 | procedural | Bindend | the same time being long enough to allow the parties to prepare and present their case in a manner suitable for the Court to deliver high-quality decisions. R. 9.3 RoP offers the Court the possibility to extend a time period referred to in the RoP |
courtName.national_DE_BGH · 2
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| German Federal Court of Justice | jurisdiction | Hintergrund | basis, in the event that the Court does not decline its jurisdiction as requested in item III., that the proceedings be stayed until a final decision of the German Federal Court of Justice has been issued in the German revocation appeal proceeding |
| Federal Supreme Court | jurisdiction | Hintergrund | EPO. However, the preconditions outlined in this provision are clearly not met. There is neither an imminent decision expected from the EPO nor is the German Federal Supreme Court poised to deliver a prompt decision. 65. There is also no provisio |
UPC (Erstinstanz) · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_484/2023 | procedural | Bindend | [FIRST PAGES] 1 UPC_CFI-484/2023 Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Central Division (Paris Seat) rejecting a Preliminary objection concerning the Preliminar |
courtName.other · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 (10) | procedural | Bindend | roceedings regarding the patent as a whole or the German portion thereof. 63. Article 30 (1) Brussels I Reg recast is not applicable. 64. In accordance with Art. 33 (10) UPCA and Rule 295 RoP, the UPC may only stay its proceedings in cases involv |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.