UPC_CFI_104/2025

FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM

NichtigkeitHauptnichtigkeitsklageParis CDRevocationCase ClosedVergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
RoP_rule_340	connection joinder of proceedings	Bindend	R. 340 Connection Joinder: In the interests of the proper administration of justice and of avoiding inconsistent decisions, where more than one action concerning the same patent...is pending before...different panels...the panels may by agreement...order that two or more actions shall...be heard together.
RoP_rule_265	withdrawal of action	Bindend	Withdrawal of the action (R. 265 RoP)
RoP_rule_295	stay of proceedings for settlement	Bindend	On 4 February 2026, the parties requested a stay of the proceedings pursuant to R. 295 (d) RoP because of a settlement.
RoP_rule_158	security for costs	Bindend	In the Reply to statement of defence/Defence to the counterclaim for infringement, IMI requests that Belparts is ordered to provide security pursuant to R. 158.1 RoP in the amount of EUR 500,000

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
33	jurisdiction	Bindend	Article 33 of the Agreement shall be respected.
69(4)	security for costs	Bindend	a defendant does not have to provide security for costs in light of the clear wording of Art. 69 (4) UPCA (UPC_CoA_596/2024)

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CoA_596/2024	security for costs — defendant not liable	Bindend	a defendant does not have to provide security for costs in light of the clear wording of Art. 69 (4) UPCA (UPC_CoA_596/2024)

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.