UPC_CFI_132/2024

Intelligent interrupt distributor

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
263	amendment of infringement action during oral hearing	Bindend	granting leave for such an amendment is regularly to be excluded, according to R. 263.2 (b) RoP and the right to defence.
118	costs allocation	Bindend	The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) (2) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP.
12	further written submissions	Bindend	Claimant requests to allow the filing of a further written submission according to R. 12.5, 36 RoP
36	further written submissions	Bindend	Claimant requests to allow the filing of a further written submission according to R. 12.5, 36 RoP
333	application for review of case management order	Bindend	An application for review pursuant to R. 333 RoP (App_18490/2025) is pending
263	amendment of claim / further submissions	Bindend	on a regular basis, a repeated request on the same procedural issue, which has already been decided, without any change in the factual or legal situation is an abuse of law and inadmissible

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
69	costs allocation	Bindend	The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) (2) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP.

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.