- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartKostenfestsetzungKategorieKostenfestsetzungen
- Parteien
- Kläger
- Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.Unternehmen
Vertreter- Bolko Ehlgen-Linklaters LLP
- Julia Schönbohm-Linklaters LLP
- Dipl.-Phys. Olaf Isfortmitwirkend-Schneiders & Behrendt
Beklagte- expert e-Commerce GmbHUnternehmen
- expert klein GmbHUnternehmen
Vertreter- Dirk Jestaedt-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Bernhard Ganahlmitwirkend-HGF Europe LLP
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Richter
- —
- Technologie
- Electrical engineeringSemiconductors
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 9. Apr. 2026
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Seoul Semiconductor Group (29 Verfahren)·expert e-Commerce GmbH (14 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 16 weitere Verfahren
UPC CoA 380/2025·UPC CFI 823/2024·UPC CFI 824/2024·UPC CFI 677/2024·UPC CoA 762/2024 und 11 weitere
1 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Dusseldorf LD·2025
- 2026-04-09Application For CostsÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The court partially granted the defendants' application for costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzungsantrag) regarding the appeal proceedings. The claimant was ordered to pay the defendants EUR 50,450.52, covering legal and patent attorney fees of EUR 49,407 plus a proportionate share of travel and accommodation costs of EUR 1,043.52. The defendants' claim that the first-instance cost agreement of EUR 100,000 also applied to the appeal was rejected.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- Costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzung) under Art. 69 UPCA and R. 150, 151, 152 RoP
- Whether a first-instance cost agreement extends to appeal proceedings
- Reasonableness and proportionality of legal and patent attorney fees
- Allocation of travel and accommodation costs between parallel proceedings
- Entscheidung%20Kostenfestsetzungsantrag_signed-1.pdf2026-04-09DE
The first-instance cost agreement does not cover appeal proceedings; only actually incurred and reasonable costs are recoverable for the appeal
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 69 UPCA; R. 150, 151, 152 RoPLegal and patent attorney fees of EUR 49,407 are reasonable and within the recoverable ceiling, and were unchallenged by the claimant
BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 152.1, 152.2 RoPTravel and accommodation costs of EUR 2,087.04 should be split 50% due to a parallel case being heard concurrently by the Court of Appeal
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 151 RoP; proportionality principle
The first-instance cost agreement of EUR 100,000 per side applies equally to the appeal proceedings, entitling defendants to EUR 101,067.47 total
BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 69 UPCATravel and accommodation costs amount to EUR 1,067.47 as claimed by the defendants
BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 151 RoP