UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 1477/2025

·EP3223320B1

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Kostenfestsetzung
Kategorie
Kostenfestsetzungen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Bolko Ehlgen (Linklaters LLP); Julia Schönbohm (Linklaters LLP); Dipl.-Phys. Olaf Isfort (Schneiders & Behrendt)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Dirk Jestaedt (Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben Partnerschaft mbB); Bernhard Ganahl (HGF Europe LLP)
Division
Richter
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
9. Apr. 2026
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-04-09
    Nur KostenKostenApplication For Costs

    The court partially granted the defendants' application for costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzungsantrag) regarding the appeal proceedings. The claimant was ordered to pay the defendants EUR 50,450.52, covering legal and patent attorney fees of EUR 49,407 plus a proportionate share of travel and accommodation costs of EUR 1,043.52. The defendants' claim that the first-instance cost agreement of EUR 100,000 also applied to the appeal was rejected.

    Rechtsfragen:Costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzung) under Art. 69 UPCA and R. 150, 151, 152 RoPWhether a first-instance cost agreement extends to appeal proceedingsReasonableness and proportionality of legal and patent attorney feesAllocation of travel and accommodation costs between parallel proceedings
Dokumente
  • Entscheidung%20Kostenfestsetzungsantrag_signed-1.pdf2026-04-09DE
Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • The first-instance cost agreement does not cover appeal proceedings; only actually incurred and reasonable costs are recoverable for the appeal

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 69 UPCA; R. 150, 151, 152 RoP
  • Legal and patent attorney fees of EUR 49,407 are reasonable and within the recoverable ceiling, and were unchallenged by the claimant

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 152.1, 152.2 RoP
  • Travel and accommodation costs of EUR 2,087.04 should be split 50% due to a parallel case being heard concurrently by the Court of Appeal

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 151 RoP; proportionality principle
Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • The first-instance cost agreement of EUR 100,000 per side applies equally to the appeal proceedings, entitling defendants to EUR 101,067.47 total

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 69 UPCA
  • Travel and accommodation costs amount to EUR 1,067.47 as claimed by the defendants

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 151 RoP